of salespeople never post on LinkedIn because they do not know what to write.
Your calls are already your best content.
Minerva reads your meeting transcripts and turns them into LinkedIn posts that sound like you.

Chosen by forward-thinking teams
























- posts generated
- 10,000+posts generated
- profiles managed
- 500+profiles managed
- saved per week
- 8hsaved per week
LinkedIn is the number one B2B channel. Your team is not posting.
Three numbers that explain why.
a week spent on content that stays under 100 impressions.
is how long generic AI content takes to kill your engagement.
Your team already says the best content out loud, on a call, to one person. Then it evaporates.
How it works
The same sentence, before and after
This is not a summary of the call and not text from a prompt. The highlighted pieces on the left were actually said in the meeting: you find them again, numbered, inside the post.
We tried this two years ago. We spent six months cleaning up the data1 (fragment 1, said on the call) and then the project just stopped there2 (fragment 2, said on the call). Now our CFO wants to see clean data first3 (fragment 3, said on the call), before signing off on anything.
"We want to see clean data first3 (fragment 3, used in the post), before we start." That is the objection I hear most. The thing is, whoever says it has already spent six months cleaning up the data1 (fragment 1, used in the post) once, and the project just stopped there2 (fragment 2, used in the post) anyway. Perfect data never arrives. Meanwhile the cost of not deciding keeps running.
Hover a number to see where it comes from
Four steps, none of which is "write a post"
Two ways to use it, one engine
Sales teams
Your reps close deals on calls. That material never becomes content, and their profiles stay frozen. Anyone who gets their message goes and checks who sent it.
- Every recorded call becomes material, with no extra work for anyone
- The rep approves and edits, instead of writing from scratch
- An active profile lifts the reply rate on outbound messages
Agencies
Ten, fifty or a hundred client profiles from one dashboard. Each client gets its own Knowledge Base and writing style, with no cross-contamination.
- Unlimited profiles: you pay per user, not per profile managed
- Distinct voice and topics for each client
- Client approval workflow built in
Compare
What a LinkedIn tool actually costs
The prices below are for the plan you actually need, not the one on the homepage. Taplio's entry plan has no AI; Expandi's personalisation runs through paid third-party tools.
- Minerva50 €/user/monthOne plan, unlimited generation, 14-day trial with no card.
- Taplio$65/monthThe $39/month Starter plan does not include the AI features: writing with AI requires Standard at $65/month.
- Kleo$99/monthA single plan, or $999/year. No free tier and no trial: you evaluate it under the 30-day money-back guarantee.
- Expandi$99/month per seatOr $950/year. Image and video personalisation run through paid external tools (Hyperise, Sendspark).
- Supergrow$139/month for 4 accountsStarter at $19/month and Pro at $39/month are individual plans. Team features (approvals, advocacy) start with Teams at $139/month for 4 accounts.
- AuthoredUp$19.95/monthOne plan with every feature, no analytics limits.
Verified August 2026. Sources on every comparison page.
See the full comparisonsWho uses it
It gave me back at least ten hours a week. The difference is that the posts contain things I actually said on calls, not generic industry advice.

Fantastic product. I recommend it without reservation.

One plan. Everything included.
No tiers, no generation limits, no features behind an upgrade. The price you see is the price you pay.
- Unlimited content generation
- Self-learning Knowledge Base
- Fathom and Fireflies integration
- Calendar and scheduled publishing
- Unlimited managed profiles
- Writing styles per profile or client
- Competitor analysis
- Support in Italian and English
Taplio with AI $65/mo · Kleo $99/mo · Expandi $99/mo per seat